For more information, contact: Theresa Grant American Health Information Management Association (312) 233-1100 theresa.grant@ahima.org LEADING HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATIONS URGE CONGRESS TO UPDATE HEALTH CODING SYSTEM WASHINGTON, DC, May 26—A group of leading healthcare associations today issued a joint statement responding to calls for further delay in adopting ICD-10 and reinforcing the need to implement the new coding system—currently being considered by the House under HR 4157 (Health Information Technology Promotion Act of 2005)—in October 2009. The statement—issued by AdvaMed, the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA), the American Hospital Association (AHA), the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA), and the Federation of American Hospitals (FAH)—details the urgent need to replace the nation’s medical coding system, outlines the benefits and readiness of ICD-10 and addresses several claims regarding perceived implementation obstacles and fraud implications. The ICD-9 coding system currently in use was developed more than 30 years ago and no longer reflects current knowledge of disease processes, contemporary medical terminology, or the modern practice of medicine. While the transition to ICD-10 has been discussed for more than 10 years, Congress must act now. ICD-9 is running out of appropriate codes to accurately track, identify, and analyze new medical services and technologies and emerging public health threats such as avian flu. There is a strong body of evidence indicating that ICD-10 provides better information needed to meet the demands of an increasingly global and electronic healthcare environment. ICD-10 provides more accurate and detailed clinical information that can improve quality measurement and patient safety activities while allowing for more accurate reimbursement—helping to identify and reduce fraud. ICD-10 will also help reap the full benefits of investment in electronic health records (EHRs) and interoperable information networks. The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) first recognized the need to replace ICD-9 in the early 1990’s and made a formal recommendation to implement ICD-10 coding in November 2003. The current proposed October 2009 implementation deadline is long overdue and reflects a realistic compromise between the demand for better data and the time needed to complete the transition. Only with a declared ICD-10 implementation deadline can the field begin to dedicate resources required to complete the detailed planning and development process. Continuing to delay the positive impact of improved data because of an unwillingness to tackle the required planning now is unacceptable. For more information on ICD-10, go to http://www.ahima.org/icd10/. About AdvaMed About AHIMA About the AHA About AMIA About the FAH ###
|